• Users Online: 11
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
CASE REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 35-37

Choosing wisely between oocyte versus embryo cryopreservation: A clinical vignette


1 Centre for Infertility and Assisted Reproduction, Gurugram, Haryana, India
2 Department of Reproductive Medicine, Milann – The Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Embryology and Fertility, Cloud Nine Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Puneet Rana Arora
Centre for Infertility and Assisted Reproduction, Gurugram, Haryana.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tofj.tofj_1_21

Rights and Permissions

In this case vignette, we highlight that embryo cryopreservation may not be an automatic choice for fertility preservation in married females but that oocyte cryopreservation also has a place. A 32-year-old married woman with breast cancer, who was initially proceeding for embryo cryopreservation to preserve her fertility before starting cancer treatment, eventually had oocyte preservation because her spouse declined to donate sperm. We discuss the need for detailed and continuous counseling.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1206    
    Printed120    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded74    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal